Comments on: 3 things to consider regarding URL’s http://www.julianbez.com/blog/2006/02/14/3-things-to-consider-regarding-urls/ web design, standards, all that stuff Sun, 22 Aug 2010 09:35:39 +0200 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8 hourly 1 By: Peter http://www.julianbez.com/blog/2006/02/14/3-things-to-consider-regarding-urls/#comment-3320 Peter Mon, 03 Apr 2006 17:22:26 +0000 http://www.julian-bez.de/blog/2006/02/14/3-things-to-consider-regarding-urls/#comment-3320 My recommendations: 1. example.com - www. is just an annoying subdomain. Double-u-double-u-double-u-dot is superfluous. 2. none. It has not to care what type of language some uses. Maybe you want to change the system from .asp to .php. So it's better to use only "/" 3. /about/ - On Unix /about would be an file. A call to /about makes the server to ask for a file /about and when it isn't found, the call for a directory /about/. That's double work for the server to do. My recommendations:

1. example.com – www. is just an annoying subdomain. Double-u-double-u-double-u-dot is superfluous.

2. none. It has not to care what type of language some uses. Maybe you want to change the system from .asp to .php. So it’s better to use only “/”

3. /about/ – On Unix /about would be an file. A call to /about makes the server to ask for a file /about and when it isn’t found, the call for a directory /about/. That’s double work for the server to do.

]]>